Warning: mkdir() [
function.mkdir]: Permission denied in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
12
Warning: mkdir() [
function.mkdir]: No such file or directory in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
12
Warning: fopen(/home/templatecore2cache//*cluesnet.com/b4/b4a0334108d98e8f4235782b8257261fc44c09be.tc2cache) [
function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
130
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
131
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
132
An electric current i flowing around a circuit produces a magnetic field and hence a
magnetic flux \Phi through the circuit. The ratio of the magnetic flux to the current is called the
inductance, or more accurately
self-inductance of the circuit. The term was coined by Oliver Heaviside in February
1886. It is customary to use the symbol L for inductance, possibly in honour of the physicist
Heinrich Lenz. The quantitative definition of the inductance is therefore
L= \frac{\Phi}{i}.
It follows that the SI units for inductance are Weber (unit) per ampere. In honour of Joseph Henry, the unit of inductance has been given the name
henry (H): 1H = 1Wb/A.
In the above definition, the magnetic flux \Phi is that caused by the current flowing through the circuit concerned. There may, however, be contributions from other circuits. Consider for example two circuits C_1, C_2, carrying the currents i_1, i_2. The magnetic fluxes \Phi_1 and \Phi_2 in C_1 and C_2, repectively, are given by
\displaystyle \Phi_1 = L_{11}i_1 + L_{12}i_2,
\displaystyle \Phi_2 = L_{21}i_1 + L_{22}i_2.
According to the above definition, L_{11} an L_{22} are the self-inductances of C_1 and C_2, repectively. It can be shown (see below) that the other two coefficients are equal: L_{12} = L_{21} = M, where M is called the
mutual inductance of the pair or circuits.
Inductance of a solenoid
A solenoid is a long, thin coil, i.e. a coil whose length is much greater than the diameter. Under these conditions, and without any magnetic material used, the
Magnetic field B within the coil is practically constant and is given by
\displaystyle B = \mu_0 Ni/l
where \mu_0 is the
permeability (electromagnetism) of free space (4π × 10-7 H/m), N the number of turns, i the current and l the length of the coil. Ignoring end effects the magnetic flux through the coil is obtained by multiplying the flux density B by the cross-section area A and the number of turns N:
\displaystyle \Phi = \mu_0N^2iA/l,
from which it follows that the inductance of a solenoid is given by:
\displaystyle L = \mu_0N^2A/l.
This, and the inductance of more complicated shapes, can be derived from
Maxwell's equations. For rigid air-core coils, inductance is a function of coil geometry and number of turns, and is independent of current.
Similar analysis applies to a solenoid with a magnetic core, but only if the length of the coil is much greater than the product of the relative permeability of the magnetic core and the diameter. That limits the simple analysis to low-permeability cores, or extremely long thin solenoids. Although rarely useful, the equations are,
\displaystyle B = \mu_0\mu_r Ni/l
where \mu_r the relative permeability of the material within the solenoid,
\displaystyle \Phi = \mu_0\mu_rN^2iA/l,
from which it follows that the inductance of a solenoid is given by:
\displaystyle L = \mu_0\mu_rN^2A/l.
Note that since the permeability of ferromagnetic materials changes with applied magnetic flux, the inductance of a coil with a ferromagnetic core will generally vary with current.
Inductance of a circular loop
The inductance of a circular conductive loop made of a circular conductor can be determined using
L = {r \mu_0 \mu_r \left( \ln{ \frac {8 r}{a--> - 2 + Y\right) }
where
μ0 and
μr are the same as above
r is the radius of the loop
a is the radius of the conductor
Y is a constant. Y=0 when the current flows in the surface of the wire (skin effect), Y=1/4 when the current is homogeneous across the wire.
Inductance for any shaped loop
Consider a current loop
\delta S with current
i(t). According to Biot-Savart law, current
i(t) sets up a
magnetic flux density at
r:
\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t)= \frac{\mu_{0}\mu_{r} i(t)}{4\pi} \int_{\delta S}{\frac{d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat r-->{r^2-->
Now magnetic flux through the surface
S the loop encircles is:
\Phi(t) = \int_S\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t) \cdot d\mathbf{A} = \frac{\mu_{0}\mu_{r} i(t)}{4\pi} \int_S \int_{\delta S}{\frac{d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat r-->{r^2--> \cdot d\mathbf{A} = Li(t)
From where we get the expression for inductance of the current loop:
L = \frac{\mu_{0}\mu_{r} }{4\pi} \int_S \int_{\delta S}{\frac{d\mathbf{l} \times \mathbf{\hat r-->{r^2--> \cdot d\mathbf{A}
where
μ0 and
μr are the same as above
d\mathbf{l} is the differential length vector of the current loop element
\mathbf{\hat r} is the unit displacement vector from the current element to the field point
r
r is the distance from the current element to the field point
r
d\mathbf{A} differential (infinitesimal) vector element of surface area
A, with
infinitesimal small magnitude and direction Surface normal to surface
S
As we see here, the geometry and material properties (if material properties are same in surface S and the material is linear) of the current loop can be expressed with single scalar quantity
L.
Inductance of a coaxial line
Let the inner conductor have radius r_i and Permeability_%28electromagnetism%29 \mu_i, let the dielectric between the inner and outer conductor have permeability \mu_d, and let the outer conductor have inner radius r_{o1}, outer radius r_{o2}, and permeability \mu_o. Assume that a DC current I flows in opposite directions in the two conductors, with uniform current density. The magnetic field generated by these currents points in the axial direction and is a function of radius r; it can be computed using
Amp%C3%A8re%27s_law:
0 \leq r \leq r_i: B(r) = \frac{\mu_i I r}{2 \pi r_i^2}
r_i \leq r \leq r_{o1}: B(r) = \frac{\mu_d I}{2 \pi r}
r_{o1} \leq r \leq r_{o2}: B(r) = \frac{\mu_o I}{2 \pi r} \left( \frac{r_{o2}^2 - r^2}{r_{o2}^2 - r_{o1}^2} \right)
The flux per unit length l in the region between the conductors can be computed by drawing a surface with surface normal pointing axially:
\frac{d\phi_d}{dl} = \int_{r_i}^{r_{o1--> B(r) dr = \frac{\mu_d I}{2 \pi} \ln\frac{r_{o1-->{r_i}
Inside the conductors, L can be computed by equating the energy stored in an inductor, \frac{1}{2}LI^2, with the energy stored in the magnetic field:
\frac{1}{2}LI^2 = \int_V \frac{B^2}{2\mu} dV
For a cylindrical geometry with no l dependence, the energy per unit length is
\frac{1}{2}L'I^2 = \int_{r_1}^{r_2} \frac{B^2}{2\mu} 2 \pi r~dr
where L' is the inductance per unit length. For the inner conductor, the integral on the right-hand-side is \frac{\mu_i I^2}{16 \pi}; for the outer conductor it is \frac{\mu_o I^2}{4 \pi} \left( \frac{r_{o2}^2}{r_{o2}^2 - r_{o1}^2} \right)^2 \ln\frac{r_{o2-->{r_{o1--> - \frac{\mu_o I^2}{8 \pi} \left( \frac{r_{o2}^2}{r_{o2}^2 - r_{o1}^2} \right) - \frac{\mu_o I^2}{16 \pi}
Solving for L' and summing the terms for each region together gives a total inductance per unit length of:
L' = \frac{\mu_i}{8 \pi} + \frac{\mu_d}{2 \pi} \ln\frac{r_{o1-->{r_i} + \frac{\mu_o}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{r_{o2}^2}{r_{o2}^2 - r_{o1}^2} \right)^2 \ln\frac{r_{o2-->{r_{o1--> - \frac{\mu_o}{4 \pi} \left( \frac{r_{o2}^2}{r_{o2}^2 - r_{o1}^2} \right) - \frac{\mu_o}{8 \pi}
However, for a typical coaxial line application we are interested in passing (non-DC) signals at frequencies for which the resistive
skin effect cannot be neglected. In most cases, the inner and outer conductor terms are negligible, in which case one may approximate
\frac{dL}{dl} \approx \frac{\mu_d}{2 \pi} \ln\frac{r_{o1-->{r_i}
Properties of inductance
The equation relating inductance and flux linkages can be rearranged as follows:
\lambda = Li \,
Taking the time derivative of both sides of the equation yields:
\frac{d\lambda}{dt} = L \frac{di}{dt} + i \frac{dL}{dt} \,
In most physical cases, the inductance is constant with time and so
\frac{d\lambda}{dt} = L \frac{di}{dt}
By
Faraday's_law_of_induction of Induction we have:
\frac{d\lambda}{dt} = -\mathcal{E} = v
where \mathcal{E} is the Electromotive force (emf) and v is the induced voltage. Note that the emf is opposite to the induced voltage. Thus:
\frac{di}{dt} = \frac{v}{L}
or
i(t) = \frac{1}{L} \int_0^tv(\tau) d\tau + i(0)
These equations together state that, for a steady applied voltage
v, the current changes in a linear manner, at a
rate proportional to the applied voltage, but inversely proportional to the inductance. Conversely, if the current through the inductor is changing at a constant rate, the induced voltage is constant.
The effect of inductance can be understood using a single loop of wire as an example. If a voltage is suddenly applied between the ends of the loop of wire, the current must change from zero to non-zero. However, a non-zero current induces a
magnetic field by Ampère's law. This change in the magnetic field induces an emf that is in the opposite direction of the change in current. The strength of this emf is proportional to the change in current and the inductance. When these opposing forces are in balance, the result is a current that increases linearly with time where the rate of this change is determined by the applied voltage and the inductance.
Phasor circuit analysis and impedance
Using
Phasor (electronics), the equivalent Electrical impedance of an inductance is given by:
Z_L = V / I = j L \omega \,
where
X_L = L \omega \, is the inductive reactance,
\omega = 2 \pi f \, is the angular frequency,
L is the inductance,
f is the frequency, and
j is the imaginary unit.
Coupled inductors
When the magnetic flux produced by an inductor links another inductor, these inductors are said to be coupled. Coupling is often undesired but in many cases, this coupling is intentional and is the basis of the transformer. When inductors are coupled, there exists a mutual inductance that relates the current in one inductor to the flux linkage in the other inductor. Thus, there are three inductances defined for coupled inductors:
L_{11} - the self inductance of inductor 1
L_{22} - the self inductance of inductor 2
L_{12} = L_{21} - the mutual inductance associated with both inductors
When either side of the transformer is a
tuned circuit, the amount of mutual inductance between the two windings determines the shape of the frequency response curve. Although no boundaries are defined, this is often referred to as loose-, critical-, and over-coupling. When two tuned circuits are loosely coupled through mutual inductance, the bandwidth will be narrow. As the amount of mutual inductance increases, the bandwidth continues to grow. When the mutual inductance is increased beyond a critical point, the peak in the response curve begins to drop, and the center frequency will be attenuated more strongly than its direct sidebands. This is known as overcoupling.
Vector field theory derivations
Mutual inductance
.
Mutual inductance is the concept that the current through one inductor can induce a voltage in another nearby inductor. It is important as the mechanism by which
transformers work, but it can also cause unwanted coupling between conductors in a circuit.
The mutual inductance,
M, is also a measure of the coupling between two inductors. The mutual inductance by circuit
i on circuit
j is given by the double integral
Franz Ernst Neumann formula
M_{ij} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \oint_{C_i}\oint_{C_j} \frac{\mathbf{ds}_i\cdot\mathbf{ds}_j}{|\mathbf{R}_{ij}|}
See a
Inductance/derivation of self inductance.
The mutual inductance also has the relationship:
M_{21} = N_1 N_2 P_{21} \!
where
M_{21} is the mutual inductance, and the subscript specifies the relationship of the voltage induced in coil 2 to the current in coil 1.
N_1 is the number of turns in coil 1,
N_2 is the number of turns in coil 2,
P_{21} is the
permeance of the space occupied by the flux.
The mutual inductance also has a relationship with the
coefficient of coupling. The coefficient of coupling is always between 1 and 0, and is a convenient way to specify the relationship between a certain orientation of inductor with arbitrary inductance:
M = k \sqrt{L_1 L_2} \!
where
k is the
coefficient of coupling and 0 ≤ k ≤ 1,
L_1 is the inductance of the first coil, and
L_2 is the inductance of the second coil.
Once this mutual inductance factor
M is determined, it can be used to predict the behavior of a circuit:
V = L_1 \frac{dI_1}{dt} + M \frac{dI_2}{dt}
where
V is the voltage across the inductor of interest,
L_1 is the inductance of the inductor of interest,
dI_1 / dt is the derivative, with respect to time, of the current through the inductor of interest,
M is the mutual inductance and
dI_2 / dt is the derivative, with respect to time, of the current through the inductor that is coupled to the first inductor.
When one inductor is closely coupled to another inductor through mutual inductance, such as in a transformer, the voltages, currents, and number of turns can be related in the following way:
V_s = V_p \frac{N_s}{N_p}
where
V_s is the voltage across the secondary inductor,
V_p is the voltage across the primary inductor (the one connected to a power source),
N_s is the number of turns in the secondary inductor, and
N_p is the number of turns in the primary inductor.
Conversely the current:
I_s = I_p \frac{N_p}{N_s}
where
I_s is the current through the secondary inductor,
I_p is the current through the primary inductor (the one connected to a power source),
N_s is the number of turns in the secondary inductor, and
N_p is the number of turns in the primary inductor.
Note that the power through one inductor is the same as the power through the other. Also note that these equations don't work if both transformers are forced (with power sources).
Self-inductance
Self-inductance, denoted
L, is the usual inductance one talks about with an
inductor.Formally the self-inductance of a wire loop would be given by the above equation with
i =
j.However, 1/|\mathbf{R}| now gets singular and the finite radius a and thedistribution of the current in the wire must be taken into account. There remain the contributionfrom the integral over all points where |\mathbf{R}| \ge a/2 and a correction term,
M_{ij} = M_{jj} = L_{jj} = L_j = L = \left (\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \oint_{C}\oint_{C'} \frac{\mathbf{ds}\cdot\mathbf{ds}'}{|\mathbf{R}|}\right )_{|\mathbf{R}| \ge a/2}
+ \frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}lYHere a and l denote radius and length of the wire, and Y is a constant that depends on thedistribution of the current in the wire: Y=0 when the current flows in the surface of the wire(skin effect), Y=1/4 when the current is homogenuous across the wire. Here is a Inductance/derivation of self inductance.
Physically, the self-inductance of a circuit represents the back-emf described by
Faraday's law of induction.
Usage
The flux \Phi_i\ \! through the
i-th circuit in a set is given by:
\Phi_i = \sum_{j} M_{ij}I_j = L_i I_i + \sum_{j\ne i} M_{ij}I_j \,
so that the
induced emf, \mathcal{E}, of a specific circuit,
i, in any given set can be given directly by:
\mathcal{E} = -\frac{d\Phi_i}{dt} = -\frac{d}{dt} \left (L_i I_i + \sum_{j\ne i} M_{ij}I_j \right ) = -\left(\frac{dL_i}{dt}I_i +\frac{dI_i}{dt}L_i \right) -\sum_{j\ne i} \left (\frac{dM_{ij-->{dt}I_j + \frac{dI_j}{dt}M_{ij} \right)
See also
References
- Karl Küpfmüller, Einführung in die theoretische Elektrotechnik, Springer-Verlag, 1959.
- Heaviside O., Electrical Papers. Vol.1. – L.; N.Y.: Macmillan, 1892, p. 429-560.
Inductance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In electrical circuits, any electric current i flowing produces a magnetic field and hence generates a total magnetic flux Φ acting on the circuit.
Definition: inductance from Online Medical Dictionary
The Online Medical Dictionary is a searchable dictionary of definitions from medicine, science and technology.
AskOxford: inductance
inductance • noun Physics the property of an electric conductor or circuit that causes an electromotive force to be generated by a change in the current flowing.
Inductance definition of Inductance in the Free Online Encyclopedia.
inductance, quantity that measures the electromagnetic induction Electromagnetic induction is the production of an electromotive force (emf) in a conductor as a result of a ...
Inductance Calibrations : Products & Services : Electrical Measurement ...
NPL maintains two primary self-inductors whose values are established from capacitance standards using two special transfer inductance standards.
self-inductance - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about self ...
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only.
Inductance
Inductance is typified by the behavior of a coil of wire in resisting any change of electric current through the coil. Arising from Faraday's law, the inductance L may be defined ...
Inductance Applet
Welcome to the Inductance Applet This applet shows how EMF is induced in a loop by changing the magnetic flux through the loop. The different ways to change the flux includes ...
Capacitance & Inductance from Absolute Calibration - capacitance ...
Capacitance & Inductance from Absolute Calibration - capacitance & inductance calibration specialists in the UK. Click through to find out more about our Capacitance & Inductance ...
inductance - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about inductance
inductance. In physics, phenomenon in which a changing current in a circuit builds up a magnetic field which induces an electromotive force either in the same circuit and opposing ...